Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting
08/25/2010 - Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The 2010 U.S. Open will get underway in less than a week, and this year's fields appear to be a bit more wide open than usual.
We already know we'll have a new men's champion next month, as 2009 winner Juan Martin del Potro announced his withdrawal from the year's final Grand Slam event last week. And on the women's side, world No. 1 superstar Serena Williams will skip America's major while she continues to recover from foot surgery. Serena needed the procedure after she cut her right foot on a broken glass at a restaurant last month.
Serena was the talk of the Open a year ago (in a bad way), after she lost to eventual champion Kim Clijsters in a most unusual fashion. The three-time Open champ was called for a foot fault during her semifinal against Clijsters, which brought the popular Belgian to match point. And Clijsters then advanced to the final when Serena was slapped with a penalty point after directing a threatening tirade at the line judge who made the ill-timed foot-fault call.
So with Delpo and Serena out of the equation, let's take a look at the true contenders in the Big Apple.
As usual, you have to look no further than Roger Federer on the men's side. The Fed, of course, is the men's all-time record-holder with his 16 major titles, including an Aussie Open one this year, and five U.S. Open championships. He was seeking a sixth straight title there last year before del Potro came from behind to stun the Swiss great in five sets in the final, halting Federer's amazing 41-match winning streak in New York in the process.
And the former world No. 1 Federer is fresh off capturing his Open Era-record- tying fourth Cincinnati Masters title last week, as he held off rapidly-rising American Mardy Fish in the final.
Speaking of Fish. you'd have to think he has a pretty good chance in the Big Apple. The Minnesota native has been one of the hottest players on the planet over the last month, having won 16-of-18 matches, including a pair of titles during that span. The four-time 2010 ATP finalist missed last year's Open because of a knee injury, but enjoyed his best-ever showing in Flushing in his last appearance there in 2008, when he landed in the quarterfinals.
Fish, who has dropped 30 pounds since last season, started the year at No. 55 and is now all the way up to No. 21.
Back over on the women's side, Clijsters will return in an attempt to capture a third U.S. Open crown. The former top-ranked star got past Denmark's Caroline Wozniacki in last year's women's final, which put an exclamation point on her celebrated return to tennis. Clijsters came out of retirement last year and secured her Open title in only her third tournament back. In the process, she became the first mother in 29 years (Evonne Goolagong) to capture a major championship.
Note: Clijsters currently sits atop the women's standings in the U.S. Open Series.
Back over to the men, Federer and Fish won't be the only contenders in New York, as Rafael Nadal will be on hand as the reigning world No. 1 and reigning Wimbledon and French Open champ. Unfortunately for Nadal, the super Spaniard has not played his best Grand Slam tennis in Flushing, where he's yet to reach a final. He has, however, been knocking on the door in the last couple of years, having reached back-to-back semifinals there.
Will 2010 be the year he breaks through to the title tilt? Rafa still needs a U.S. Open championship to complete the career Golden Slam, which is all four majors and Olympic gold. Only six men have won all four Grand Slam events during their careers, with Federer being the last to turn the trick when he won the French Open last season.
Nadal and Federer should face some stiff opposition from some other top-10 stars, like former Aussie Open champ and former U.S. Open runner-up (to Federer) Novak Djokovic, reigning Aussie Open runner-up (to Federer) and former U.S. Open runner-up (to Federer) Andy Murray, two-time French Open runner-up (to Federer and Nadal, respectively) Robin Soderling and Wimbledon runner-up (to Nadal) Tomas Berdych. Is it me, or have Federer and Nadal been hogging up all the major titles?
I don't like Djokovic's chances of winning his first U.S. Open, just because he hasn't been able to close out that many big matches over the last couple of years. As it is for most players, things haven't boded all that well for the Djoker when he runs into Federer or Nadal at a major.
Murray's chances are better than Djokovic's, especially against Federer. I know, Murray's never beaten the Fed at a Slam, but I think he's getting very close and he does own a winning record (7-5) against the Swiss legend overall. Federer beat Murray in the 2008 U.S. Open final and this year's Oz Open finale.
I think he's (Murray) got a real shot in Flushing next month.
Note: Murray and Federer are tied atop the leaderboard (170 points apiece) in the U.S. Open Series, which is a series of North American hardcourt events that lead up to the U.S. Open, with the winner set to double his/her money in Flushing. Murray holds a tiebreaker advantage over Federer in the those particular standings.
Soderling has appeared in the last two French Open finals, but he's never done all that much in New York. The Swedish thumper did have his best-ever stay in Flushing last year, reaching the quarters for the first time.
Berdych has been one of the better major participants this summer, reaching his first-ever French Open semifinal, and then following up that performance with his first-ever trip into a Grand Slam final at Wimbledon, where he lost to Nadal.
Is a second straight trip into a major final in the offing for the big Czech? I don't think so.
And who are the more serious contenders in New York besides Clijsters?
Well, there are a bevy of women who could win the Open, but I'm not so sure who the front-runners are. Clijsters probably heads in as the favorite, with Serena on the sidelines until late next month.
Last year's runner-up to Clijsters, Wozniacki, has played some fine tennis this year, including a trio of titles, and the youngest player in the women's top 10 will head to New York as the top seed. The great Dane's latest championship came in Montreal this week, as she handled Wimbledon runner-up Vera Zvonareva in the Rogers Cup finale.
Wozniacki, who is the top seed in Gotham in Serena's absence, is a favorite to be sure.
Jelena Jankovic is a former No. 1 who reached the final there two years ago, only to lose to Serena. She's being playing some decent ball this year, but the Serbian diva hasn't quite been the same since reaching No. 1 in 2008 and losing to top spot early last season.
Two-time champion Venus Williams will be in the draw, but she hasn't reached an Open final since 2002, and hasn't titled there since 2001. Those numbers alone tell me the seven-time Grand Slam champ probably won't enjoy U.S. Open glory again. But you never know.
After Venus, the women's list still has a ton of capable players, but how serious are their chances of winning? The list includes two-time major finalist and 2004 Open runner-up Elena Dementieva, French Open champion Francesca Schiavone, Zvonareva, French Open runner-up Samantha Stosur, talented Belarusian Victoria Azarenka, and former U.S. Open winners Maria Sharapova and Svetlana Kuznetsova.
Schiavone and Stosur have no shot at titling in NYC next month. So let's get that out of the way. I still don't know how Schiavone won the French, but at least that came on clay, her best surface. She'll be in way over her head on the hard stuff in Flushing.
Dementieva always has a chance in New York, but how come she can never seal the deal? Is it because of her weak serve? It has to be, because she can put her punishing groundstrokes up against anybodys.
Zvonareva has been solid this summer and could be ready for her breakthrough in the Apple. She appeared in her first career major final last month at Wimbledon, has played as well as anybody over the last two months, and has already appeared in four finals (1-3) this season.
I mentioned Azarenka, but I still think she lacks the maturity to win seven straight matches at a major. She definitely has the game.
As for the three-time major champion Sharapova and two-time Grand Slam victor Kuznetsova?
Sharapova, who captured the Open in 2006, has battled a series of injuries over the past couple of years, and I just don't think that she's all the way back to the point where she could go undefeated over two weeks. The Russian star has, however, quietly gone 23-5 over her last 28 matches, including trips into three finals (0-3) in her last four events.
Kuznetsova struggled mightily for the better part of this '10 campaign, but she's relocated her game in recent weeks, going 9-2, including a title in San Diego and a semifinal spot in Montreal last week/this week.
Do any Americans, aside from Venus, have shot in New York?
The top American men are 2003 champion and 2006 runner-up Andy Roddick, 6- foot-9 John Isner and Sam Querrey, who's quietly won four titles on the ATP World Tour this season.
The former No. 1 Roddick recently dropped out of the top 10 (but then re- entered it this week), blaming a mild bout of mono for his recent poor results. He captured his only Grand Slam title in New York seven long years ago, and something tells me that's the only one he'll ever win.
Isner became famous for playing in the longest-ever tennis match in the first round at Wimbledon back in June, and he's got the type of game (massive serve and massive forehand) that could land him in the second week in Flushing. Does he have enough game to soar all the way into the final.
Not yet.
Querrey leads all Americans with his four titles on four different surfaces this season, but can he add a U.S. Open one to his resume in the coming weeks? Like everyone else, he'd have to get past Nadal, Federer, Djokovic and/or Murray in order to do so.
With all due respect to Roddick, I think Fish might have the best chance of making the most noise among the Americans in the Big Apple. Maybe I'm underestimating Roddick and Querrey, but Fish has been the hottest of all his compatriots heading in. Has Fish peaked too soon? We'll see.
Note: With his 140 points, only Murray and Federer are ahead of Mr. Fish in the U.S. Open Series standings.
Venus is the only American woman with a chance of titling in New York. Melanie Oudin had that Cinderella run into the quarters a year ago, and she needed a series of come-from-behind victories over a slew of Russian stars in order to do so. The young Oudin has struggled somethin' fierce this season and it would be a shocker to me if she reached the quarters again in New York.
My darkhorse on the men's side would have to be Argentine David Nalbandian. The defensive specialist has always frustrated Federer and has won 15 of his last 18 matches, including a hardcourt title in D.C. just a few weeks ago.
Sorry, but I really don't have a darkhorse on the ladies' side. Maybe Li Na, who along with Zheng Jie became the first Chinese women to reach a Grand Slam semifinal, which they did in Melbourne back in January.
I don't have to make picks to win...but I'm going to anyway.
I actually like Federer to win his sixth Open title in seven years and Clijsters to repeat and nail down her third Open championship. (I really wanted to take Murray here.)
The '10 U.S. Open will start Monday at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.
<< Travers is wide-open Mid-Summer Derby
Saratoga Springs, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Saturday's $1 million Travers Stakes
has attracted an evenly matched field of 11 three-year-olds. Saratoga's Mid-
Summer Derby will be conducted over the main track at 1 1/4-miles.
Local winner A
<< NL West: Padres running away with division
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Only a monumental collapse or some gypsy curse over the
next few weeks can derail the San Diego Padres in their quest for a third
division title since 2005.
The Padres won the NL West five years ago and share
<< CFL Previews - August 27-28 - Week Nine
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) -
CALGARY STAMPEDERS (6-1) at BRITISH COLUMBIA LIONS (1-6)
DATE & TIME: Friday, August 27, 10:30 p.m. (et).
GAME NOTES: A couple of teams heading in opposite directions in the CFL's
Western Division
<< Kroenke becomes majority owner of Rams
St. Louis, MO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The St. Louis Rams announced on Wednesday
that E. Stanley Kroenke has become the majority owner of the club.
The decision was made via a vote by the rest of the league's owners at a
meeting in Atlanta.
"St
Carlos Eduardo leaves Hoffenheim for Rubin Kazan >>
Sinsheim, Germany (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Hoffenheim midfielder Carlos Eduardo
completed a move to Russian champions Rubin Kazan on Wednesday.
The 23-year-old Brazilian has spent the past three seasons with Hoffenheim,
scoring 13 goals i
For golf, it's the Summer of Rules >>
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - I know the feeling.
You wake up in the morning and realize one of three things has happened: 1)
You have forgotten to set your alarm; 2) You have set your alarm, but woke up
and turned it off; or 3) You set your alarm, whi
CFL West: Stamps and Riders to battle for first >>
Toronto, Canada (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The West Division returns to play this week
after a bye, with the two basement dwellers set to host the top teams. The
Edmonton Eskimos and BC Lions have a lot of work cut out for them to get back
into the swi
Rays activate Niemann from DL >>
Anaheim, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Tampa Bay Rays have reinstated pitcher Jeff
Niemann from the 15-day disabled list to start Wednesday's game versus the
Angels.
Niemann, who is 10-3 with a 3.12 ERA in 22 games this season, was on the
Is there such a thing as a trap game in the NFL?
I once asked that question to Pete Korner, who at the time was office manager and a senior linesmaker for Las Vegas Sports Consultants.
Korner almost ripped my head off. There is no such thing as a trap game, he loudly berated me. It’s a myth. The numbers are made using power ratings, he said.
There are trap games, though. They just might not be what you think. The perception is of a good team, say Philadelphia, laying a small number against New Orleans.
Using the highly-respected power ranking from The Gold Sheet, you’d find the Eagles with a power rating of 4 and the Saints at 8. When you factor the game being played in New Orleans, you could see why the line opened so short at less than a field goal.
For some, this makes it enticing to take the Eagles. That’s not a real trap game, though.
A real trap game, says professional gambler Dave Malinsky, is thinking you’re getting value betting a bad team, which brings us to the Oakland Raiders-Denver Broncos matchup.
The Raiders are +15 in this long-standing division rivalry. Denver is on a short week having dispatched Baltimore Monday. However, the Raiders haven’t covered the spread their last 10 games.
Many bettors don’t trust the Raiders to give a full effort. Few think much of Art Shell and his Oakland’s coaching staff.
So oddsmakers have to do something to make Oakland attractive if they hope to get equal action.
Now Malinsky is a value shopper. But he won’t touch the Raiders even getting more than two touchdowns.
“I try to eliminate the undisciplined, unfocused teams because they’re the ones most likely to suffer the bad beats,” he said.
Near the top of Malinsky’s list of stay-away teams is the Miami Dolphins, who have yet to cover a spread this season.
“Whatever you think of Nick Saban, you have to look at the penalties and turnovers,” Malinsky said.
It’s easy to point out the Dolphins failed to get the money this past week against New England because Olindo Mare missed a field goal and had another field goal blocked. But even though the Dolphins outgained the Patriots, 283-213, they committed eight penalties.
Bad teams not only cost themselves victories, but pointspread covers as well. The Arizona Cardinals and Green Bay Packers are two more examples.
The Cardinals couldn’t have been in a better position this past Sunday, up 14-0 at home against a mediocre Kansas City Chiefs squad. But they couldn’t hold it. The Packers got a push against St. Louis, but also could have won losing by three when Brett Favre fumbled at the St. Louis 11-yard line with 44 seconds left.
“The Packers were in a position to beat Philadelphia, too,” Malinsky said. “But they couldn’t even cover double digits.
“These teams just make mistakes and it costs you … they always will look good from a value standpoint. They really will. But that’s the trap.”
Houston and Tennessee rank among the six-worst teams. Malinsky wouldn’t be afraid to take either of these teams, however, if the price were high enough.
The Texans are bad, Malinsky said, but they have some discipline. The Titans showed they could not only come up with an outstanding game plan, but execute it as well, losing by one to the Colts on the road as an 18 ?-point underdog this past Sunday.
“Jeff Fisher is a worker,” Malinsky said of the Titans coach. “I’m not sure how hard Art Shell wants to work when he gets out of bed.”
Fisher, though, could be out as Tennessee coach after this season. Is he still worth backing in the right spot, with the right price, as a lame duck coach?
“It’s in his nature to keep working hard and not worry about any possible lame duck status,” Malinsky said. “He’s coaching for his resume.”
Note: Monday night game will be picked Monday. Lines used are from football betting lines.
Rule No. 1 in the gamblers' handbook states, "Avoid sports betting on meaningless games."
When you're drowning in a sea of baseball monotony, however, things change. Even a hint of pro football betting can persuade the most disciplined bettor to break a few rules.
The NFL preseason is around the corner, with a tempting Hall of Fame match kicking off on Sunday. But bettors must stay vigilant. Wagering on NFL exhibition games is an entirely different beast than the regular season. Most fans don't recognize the players on the field because starters get as much action in August as Warcraft fans get on Prom night.
The only certainty about the NFL this time of year is uncertainty – and yet there are some who say betting in August can be a gold mine.
“I actually feel the NFL preseason presents solid profit opportunities for sharp bettors and handicappers,” Sports Expert Steve Merril explains. “My experience has been that the sportsbooks fear the preseason, which is evident by lower limits and massive moves.”
The line moves are attributed to the limited knowledge available regarding playing-time distribution. One team’s top unit out on the field for one more series has an impact on the pointspread. Setting lines in the preseason often is a shot in the dark.
“We base the betting lines mostly on public perception,” Pete Korner, founder of the Sports Club in Las Vegas, says. “It’s very tough to predict, almost a guessing game.”
The preseason is all about figuring out who’s in and for how long.
“It becomes a race between bettors and oddsmakers to find out how long the quarterbacks are going to stay in,” Korner admits. “If a sharp gets the information first, he could exploit an early line. I’m a full believer in moving the line in the preseason if the books find out something late in the week.”
Determining what each team’s motive is can help bettors handicap. To do this you must pay close attention to the philosophies head coaches employ in exhibition play.
“You need to know what a coach is trying to accomplish,” says Covers Expert Bryan Leonard. “Sometimes a new coach will want to instill a winning attitude. Others just want to make sure their starters don’t get hurt."
So how do you distinguish who’s playing scared and who’s playing for keeps?
“Head coaches on the hot seat or new coaches trying to implement a winning attitude usually try harder to win in the preseason,” Merril says.
Cleveland Browns head coach Romeo Crennel fits this criteria. He’s entering his third season as the sideline boss and has yet to lead the Browns to more than six wins.
Cleveland is an enticing bet as well because of the unresolved quarterback situation. General manager Phil Savage sacrificed the Browns’ first-round pick in next year’s draft for Brady Quinn, but the former Notre Dame quarterback hasn’t signed or reported to training camp yet.
Charlie Frye and Derek Anderson split time at QB last season and it looks like either player (or even Quinn) could be the opening-day starter.
“If a team has quarterback depth and the pecking order hasn’t been decided, it’s a big advantage,” Leonard says.
Even in the third week of the preseason when starters generally play the most, the final outcome of the game is in the hands of fringe players. A team's talent, all the way down to the last man on the roster, is something to consider.
The New England Patriots have long been considered one of the deeper teams in the NFL and coach Bill Belichick has said in the past he’s unafraid of stars getting hurt in games with nothing on the line. He shocked his colleagues in 2003 by playing some of his starters on special teams in the preseason.
“We want to have the team ready to play a tough, physical game and preparation has to go into that and I imagine a certain amount of injuries go with it,” Belichick told the Providence Journal in August 2003.
Bettors can only hope to find more teams that share the Pats' business-like approach to the preseason (New England is 17-9-3 against the spread since 2000) and take advantage of teams who detest the exhibition schedule.
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.
Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting